您已經為這群跨國房東提供買房、裝潢、出租、託管的一條龍服務。 這份提案的核心很簡單——把這份服務,變成房東手機裡隨時打開的一頁。
You already offer this group of cross-border owners an end-to-end service: buying, renovation, leasing, property management. The core of this proposal is simple — turn that service into a single page they can open from their phone, anytime.
"今年跟這家代理把我租的房子買下來⋯⋯不管是買房、裝潢、出租,他們都是一條龍幫我包辦,非常方便。"
"This year I bought the property I was renting through this agency... whether it's buying, renovating, or leasing, they handle it all end-to-end. Very convenient."
"我目前在泰國這邊都是透過他們,已經買了 6 間房子了。他們的創辦人真的把泰國當成他自己的事業發展重心⋯⋯對整個市場都很清楚、很瞭解。"
"I've bought 6 properties in Thailand, all through them. Their founder really treats Thailand as his own business focus — knows the entire market inside out."
這群人是您的核心資產——他們不止買一次,他們持續買、持續租、持續託管。
These people are your core asset — they don't just buy once. They keep buying, keep renting, keep entrusting.
但他們也是最難服務的客戶:人在台灣,房在曼谷;月底想看租金,深夜想知道冷氣修好沒;對著匯率算實質收益,還得用 LINE 跟管家、會計、裝潢窗口分別溝通。
But they're also the hardest to serve: living in Taiwan, properties in Bangkok; checking rent at month-end, wondering at midnight if the AC was fixed; calculating real returns against exchange rates, juggling separate LINE chats with property managers, accountants, and renovation contractors.
您現在已經提供這些服務了。 但這些服務只在房東「想到要問」的時候才會被想起。 它們沒有一個被房東「每天打開一次」的入口。
You're already providing all these services. But these services only get noticed when the owner thinks to ask. They don't have a single entry point the owner opens once a day.
想直接問一個問題:「目前管家團隊每個月花在回答『租金匯入沒?』、『維修進度如何?』這類問題上,大約佔用多少人力?」
A direct question worth asking: "How many hours per month does the property management team spend answering questions like 'Has the rent come in?' or 'How's the repair going?'"
如果這套系統能省下一個助理 50% 的工作時間,這就是最直接的 ROI(投資回報率)。
If this system saves even 50% of one assistant's working time, that's the most direct ROI.
提案的核心:一個房東專屬的 PWA(漸進式網頁應用)。
Core of the proposal: a dedicated Owner PWA (Progressive Web App).
房東打開瀏覽器,登入,看到他所有的房產——曼谷那間、清邁那間、杜拜那間——每張卡片顯示這個月的租金、出租狀態、最近的維修進度。
The owner opens the browser, logs in, and sees all their properties — the one in Bangkok, the one in Chiang Mai, the one in Dubai — with each card showing this month's rent, rental status, and recent repair progress.
想聯絡管家?點一下按鈕,直接接通 LINE 對應窗口。 想看年度報表?系統自動產出。就這麼簡單。
Want to contact the property manager? One tap connects them via LINE to the right person. Want the annual report? The system generates it automatically. That simple.
我建議 MVP 階段刻意「做小」——只做房東日常會用到、您現有服務能立刻支援的功能。等運作順暢、客戶回饋穩定後,再決定是否加大範圍。
I recommend deliberately making the MVP "small" — only the features owners use daily and your existing service can immediately support. Once it runs smoothly with stable feedback, then expand.
上述「先不做」的項目,都可在 MVP 運作順暢後,以階段擴充方式逐步加入。範圍與時程依需求另議。
Anything in "Excludes" can be added in later phases once the MVP runs smoothly. Scope and timeline negotiable.
實際時程依需求複雜度與資料準備狀況而定。每個階段都有明確交付物,讓您隨時掌握進度。
Actual timeline depends on requirement complexity and data readiness. Each phase has clear deliverables so you stay in the loop.
與創辦人、管家團隊訪談,確認資料欄位、業務流程、介面風格。產出完整 UI 稿,確認後動工。
Interviews with the founder and the property management team to confirm data fields, workflow, and visual direction. Deliver complete UI mockups, then begin development.
房東登入、房產列表、財務顯示、後台管理介面。每階段交付可預覽版本,您可隨時上線看進度。
Owner login, property list, financial display, back-office UI. Deliver preview builds at each stage — you can check progress live anytime.
選 5–10 位友好房東封閉測試,優化體驗。同步把您現有客戶資料導入系統。
Select 5–10 friendly owners for a closed beta. Optimize experience. Import existing client data into the system.
系統正式對外。提供您業務、管家團隊操作說明文件與訓練。
System goes live. Documentation and training for sales and property management teams.
上線後一段期間內 Bug 修復免費。後續可進入長期維運合作。
Free bug fixes for an initial period after launch. Long-term maintenance contract optional thereafter.
合作採里程碑制——每階段完成、確認交付物之後再進入下一階段。
Engagement is milestone-based — each phase completes and deliverables are signed off before moving to the next.
具體報價會依最終確認的範圍與功能複雜度而定,我會在第一次需求訪談後,提供詳細的範圍說明書與報價單給您參考。
Specific pricing depends on the final confirmed scope and feature complexity. After the first requirements interview, I'll provide a detailed scope document and quotation for your review.
整體投資包含三個部分:一次性 MVP 建置費、上線後月度維運、以及未來功能擴充。MVP 階段的目標是把核心服務跑順,後續是否加大投資,完全由您依實際成效決定。
Overall investment has three parts: one-time MVP build, monthly post-launch maintenance, and future feature extensions. The MVP goal is to get the core service running smoothly. Whether to scale up is entirely your call, based on actual results.
我不是一家代理商,但也不是單打獨鬥的接案者。
I'm not an agency, but I'm not a lone freelancer either.
我採取「單點責任 + 資深顧問網絡」的合作模式——所有溝通由我一個人對接,沒有專案經理層層轉述;但在重要決策(系統架構、安全審查、上線前測試)會引入有 B2B SaaS 經驗的資深工程師顧問把關。
I operate with a "single point of responsibility + senior advisor network" model — all communication goes through me directly, no project managers relaying messages; but on key decisions (system architecture, security review, pre-launch testing), I bring in senior engineers with B2B SaaS experience to review and sign off.
單一窗口,不用面對團隊。需要調整、需要決策,一通電話搞定。
Single contact, no team to navigate. Need adjustments or decisions? One call handles it.
沒有代理商的層層加價,但有代理商等級的品質把關。
No agency markup layers, but agency-grade quality review.
同期只接 1–2 個案子,您是我這段期間的核心客戶。
Only 1–2 projects at a time. You are my core client during this period.
運用最新 AI 開發工具,在保有品質的前提下大幅縮短交付時程。
Using the latest AI development tools to dramatically shorten delivery time without sacrificing quality.
這個 proposal 目前是以 MVP(第一階段版本)的方向去設計,重點不是一次做成大型系統,而是先把最核心、最有感的 owner experience 建立起來。
This proposal is designed in MVP direction (Phase 1 version). The point isn't to build a huge system at once — it's to first establish the most core, most impactful owner experience.
例如:
For example:
我會希望先用比較 lean、快速迭代的方式,做出一個真正能運作、也能實際驗證價值的版本。
I'd like to use a lean, fast-iteration approach — build a version that actually works and genuinely validates value.
如果第一階段效果不錯,後續其實也可以再慢慢延伸,例如:
If Phase 1 goes well, the system can naturally extend, for example:
比起一開始就做成很重的大型系統,我更希望它是一個能跟著業務一起成長的產品。
Rather than building a heavy enterprise system from day one, I'd rather it be a product that grows with the business.
我知道對您來說,這個系統不會直接帶來新生意——它的價值在於「讓現有客戶體驗更好」,屬於品牌維護型的投資。
I understand this system won't directly bring you new business — its value is "making the existing client experience better". It's a brand-maintenance investment.
所以我刻意把 MVP 範圍控制得很精煉,而不是市面上代理商常見的「完整大型專案」做法。我希望這是一個「可以先試試看」的合作,而不是「需要董事會討論」的大案。
So I've deliberately kept the MVP scope tight, rather than the typical agency "full enterprise project" approach. I want this to be a "let's try it" kind of engagement, not a "let's call a board meeting" kind of project.
如果 MVP 做得好,我們再討論下一步——擴大範圍、做原生 App、做更深層的系統整合。如果第一階段做完成效有限,投入也維持在可控範圍內。
If the MVP works well, we discuss next steps — expanding scope, going native, deeper system integrations. If Phase 1 shows limited results, the investment stayed within a controllable range.
如果這個方向您有興趣,我建議的下一步是:約 20–30 分鐘視訊或面對面聊,讓我了解您實際的服務流程,我也會帶著更具體的介面方向與您討論。
If this direction interests you, I'd suggest a 20–30 minute video or in-person chat — so I can understand your actual service workflow, and bring more concrete interface directions to discuss together.